Sentence alignment for gv-dan-20120326-2990.xml (html) - gv-eng-20120321-303600.xml (html)

#daneng
1Egypten: Kvinders ret til skilsmisse diskuteret i parlamentetEgypt: Women's Right to Divorce Debated in Parliament
2[Alle links i dette indlæg er på engelsk, medmindre andet er angivet]The performance of the new Egyptian parliament continues to stir debate on social media sites.
3Det nye egyptiske parlaments bedrifter skaber fortsat debat på diverse sociale medie-sites.The new parliament was seen as a move towards to democracy.
4However, the parliament continues to discuss matters that seem irrelevant to the country's most pressing needs - such as a request to ban pornographic websites.
5Det nye parlament blev set som et skridt på vejen mod demokrati.There has been another controversy over an MP who claimed that English classes are a plot to westernize Egyptians.
6Dog bliver parlamentet ved med at diskutere sager, der virker irrelevante i forhold til, hvad landet mest har brug for - såsom en anmodning om at forbyde pornografiske hjemmesider.The most recent fiasco was about an MP's request to strip women of their right to file for a divorce. In the past, when it came to women's right to divorce, Egyptian women were seriously discriminated against.
7Der har også været polemik om et medlem af parlamentet, der påstod at engelskundervisning er en sammensværgelse for at vestliggøre egyptere.Men had the right to divorce their wives without going to court. Women had to go through a long, complicated and bureaucratic procedure to obtain a divorce.
8Den seneste fiasko var et medlem af parlamentet, der anmodede om at fratage kvinder deres ret til at begære skilsmisse.The situation was slightly improved in 2000 when a law was passed that give women the right to file for a no-fault divorce (Khul').
9Før i tiden var egyptiske kvinder voldsomt diskriminerede, når det kom til deres ret til at blive skilt.Through this law, women can get a divorce but have to let go of all their financial rights.
10Mænd havde ret til at blive skilt fra deres koner uden at skulle for retten.Social media users reacted quickly to the draft law suggesting the cancellation of khul' in parliament.
11Kvinder skulle igennem en lang, kompliceret og bureaukratisk procedure for at opnå skilsmisse.Merit Al-Sayed says [ar]: A draft law to cancel Khul' is a grave mistake.
12Situationen forbedredes minimalt i år 2000, da der blev vedtaget en lov om at give kvinder ret til en skilsmisse ved enighed (Khul').Khul' was a step forward for women; it's their right to start over with their lives. Mira Samy adds [ar]:
13Ved hjælp af denne lov kan kvinder blive skilt, men er nødt til at give afkald på alle deres økonomiske rettigheder.A draft law to cancel Khul'? Is this parliament here to take away all our rights instead of getting our lost ones?
14Or is it a part of a plan to make us say “come back Mubarak”?
15Brugere af sociale medier reagerede hurtigt på parlamentets lovforslag til annullering af khul'.Not only women were angry as many male supporters also shared their outrage.
16Merit Al-Sayed siger [ar]:Wael Khalil pleads [ar]:
17Et lovforslag til annullering af Khul' er en alvorlig fejl.What I was worried about is happening: a draft law to cancel Khul'.
18Khul' var et skridt fremad for kvinder: det er deres ret at begynde forfra med deres liv.Dear MPs, show us some clever work against the authorities and the military, not against the peaceful population.
19Mira Samy tilføjer [ar]:Ali Hagras exclaims:
20Canceling Khul' law is simply giving the green light for men to sexually abuse their wives; and if she objects she would be called an infidel?
21Et lovforslag om at annullere Khul'?Would you like that to happen to your sister, bearded men?
22Er dette parlament her for at fjerne alle vores rettigheder i stedet for at give os de tabte tilbage?And Sherif Khairy reasons: This draft law is naïve, to say the least.
23Eller er det en del af en plan for at få os til at sige “kom tilbage Mubarak”?If it is harmful when a divorce happens, wouldn't it be even more harmful if they live together while hating each other?
24Det var ikke kun kvinder, der var vrede.As usual, there were many sarcastic and humorous comments.
25Noon Arabia has created a Storify of on the debate mainly with tweets from @Elma7roossa who wrote several tweets under the hashtag #الخلع_قوة which translates to “Khul' is power.”
26Mange mandlige støtter delte også deres harme.Additionally, Riham Mohamed jokes:
27Wael Khalil bønfalder [ar]:The parliament is playing with fire.
28Nu sker det, jeg var bekymret for: et forslag om at annullere Khul'.If they say they would cancel Khul', women would go and cut you into pieces! :D
29Kære medlemmer af parlamentet, vis os en begavet indsats mod autoriteterne og militæret - ikke mod den fredelige befolkning.Muhab Talaat also offers: The MP who requested canceling Khul' definitely wants to fool around but afraid that his wife would divorce him!
30Ali Hagras udbryder:And Sally Zohney quotes her mother:
31At annullere Khul'-loven er simpelthen at give mænd grønt lys til at misbruge deres koner seksuelt; og hvis hun protesterer, bliver hun så kaldt utro?My mother who's afraid of protesting says “if this parliament of retards cancels Khul', I'll set up a tent in front of parliament and will not leave.” I lost my mind!
32Kunne I, skæggede mænd, tænke jer, at det skulle ske for jeres søstre? Og Sherif Khairy overvejer:It's worth noting that the MP who filed the draft law to cancel Khul' is not a member of Islamists parties, but a former member of the liberal Wafd Party.
33Dette lovforslag er mildest talt naivt.Ahmed Shokeir offers his viewpoint on this:
34Hvis det er skadeligt når skilsmissen rammer, er det så ikke endnu mere skadeligt, hvis de bor sammen, når de hader hinanden?An MP's request to cancel Khul', which is religiously accepted, to appease the Islamists is like trading with religion.
35Som sædvanligt var der mange sarkastiske og humoristiske kommentarer.This confirms that requesting matters under the guise of religion is not for religion's sake.
36Noon Arabia har lavet en Storify ud af debatten hovedsageligt med tweets fra @Elma7roossa, som har skrevet indtil flere tweets under hashtagget #الخلع_قوة , som lader sig oversætte til “Khul' er magt.”Indeed, the debate also tackled whether Khul' is Islamic or not. Many users cited that Khul' is indeed a part of Islamic jurisprudence.
37Derudover joker Riham Mohamed: Parlamentet leger med ilden.Mohamed ElGohary affirms that Khul' is Islamic and says:
38Hvis de siger, at de vil annullere Khul', vil kvinder gå ud og skære jer i småstykker! ?Khlo3 can't be cancelled, as long as there is an “Islam is the basic source for legislation” is in the constitution.
39Finally, not everyone agrees on the matter, and not everyone thinks canceling Khul' is a bad move.
40Muhab Talaat har også et bud:Twitter user @_ADHEM tweets:
41Det parlamentsmedlem, der forslog at annullere Khul', vil helt sikkert gerne fjolle rundt med andre kvinder, men er bange for, at hans kone vil lade sig skille!I am against Khul' because there's nothing in Islam that says so, and for those 50 Twitter users who're with it, it's no big deal, they already travel abroad a lot!