Sentence alignment for gv-eng-20151202-548675.xml (html) - gv-mlg-20151203-77327.xml (html)

#engmlg
1GV Face: How Do You Feel About The Term “Terrorism”?
2When should we call an act of violence “terrorism” and when should we call a militant a “terrorist”?
3Names and labels are something we take very seriously at Global Voices.
4From our editorial code: “Be aware of the labels you attach to individuals, people and groups.
5Question terms, names, photos or practices used in other media and by governments - only use labels that are in line with our code and values”.
6Our editorial team launched a discussion about avoiding the use the terms terror, terrorism or terrorist, unless it was in a quote or attributed to a source, because of:
7We agreed that “descriptions of actions are more powerful than adjectives”.
8And that we should be wary of playing into the hands of governments and groups that want to control narratives and perceptions through labels.
9Following this discussion, one of our oldest contributors from Peru, Juan Arellano, expressed concern that the decision to not use the label was insulting to the memory of victims who died at the hands of terrorism.
10He gave the example of the Shining Path in Peru.
11In this episode of GV Face we open up the discussion of labels, the politics of language especially around “terrorism” to the Global Voices community.
12Juan Arellano is joined by GV's news editor Lauren Finch, Taisa Sganzerla, our Brazil editor, Lebanese blogger and MENA contributor Joey Ayoub, RunetEcho editor Kevin Rothrock and Elizabeth Rivera, our social media editor and Latin America contributor.
13To start the discussion, we played a little game of word association with the term terrorist and the responses were: ISIS, violence against civilians, heart-wrenching, darkness, mass murder, fear-mongering, and politics.
14Here are some excerpts from the conversation.GV Face: Ahoana ny fahatsapanao amin'ny voambolana “Fampihorohoroana”?
15I asked Joey why he didn't use the term terrorism in his writing.
16His response (02:30- 3:10): I am very uncomfortable with the word terrorism.Rahoviana isika no mametraka ny herisetra iray ho “fampihorohoroana” ary rahoviana isika no hilaza ny mpitolona iray ho “mpampihorohoro”?
17And it is not that I don't believe that it exists.
18It obviously does and the definition of terrorism is more or less straightforward.
19But it is used so often in such obviously dishonest ways, that it has lost all meaning for me.
20And it is not that the Paris attacks were not terrorism, they obviously were, they meet every definition of it.
21There are so many acts that are terrorism, but they will never be called terrorism, because of the political implications of doing so.
22It is a word that has lost it meaning, if it ever had one specifically.
23Our news editor Lauren Finch explained how she dealt with the politics of language around terrorism while editing stories from different parts of the world(3:45-5:20):
24The cases where it is a no-brainer that we are going to use the word terrorism or terrorist or terror attack is when it is an official charge or if it is a quote.
25Someone has been brought up on terror charges or a government official said ‘this was a terror attack, what happened yesterday'.
26What doesn't quite make sense, especially for the GV community or audience, because we are so diverse, we are from all around the world, and it is really hard to take for granted some sort of common background knowledge between all of us from many different backgrounds and experiences, is “what terrorism is?”
27It differs depending on history and country and context.
28So it is hard to use it, out of the blue to call something a terrorist act without attributing it to something else because we don't know what definition the author is going on.
29Is it the definition in Ethiopia? The definition in Peru?Raisin'ny Global Voices ho tena zava-dehibe tokoa ny anarana sy ny petak'anarana.
30The different definitions used by three different government departments in the US?
31It is really hard to assume that we are all working with the same definition of terrorism, and they differ across the world.
32Some have to do with a political goal in mind.
33Some have to do with violation of human rights.
34Some have to do with threat of violence, not actual violence.
35Attribution is the key, at least when we are working with Global Voices authors.
36Juan Arellano explained why he thought there was no need to use attributions while referring to the Shining Path as terrorists.
37He said (13:48- 14:30):
38I lived through years of terrorism in Peru. I was never directly affected.Avy amin'ny fitsipika mipetraka ato amin'ny toniam-panoratana: “Mitandrema amin'ny petak'anarana raiketinareo amin'ny tsirairay, vondron'olona sy vahoaka.
39But I read and watched the news as it was happening.
40So it was a close experience.
41I understand that there is an abuse of the term of the word.
42Environmental activists are mislabeled here as well. We are not strangers to the global conversation about terrorism.Anontanio ny voambolana, anarana, sary ary fomba ampiasain'ny fampitam-baovao hafa sy ireo governemanta - ny petak'anarana izay mifanaraka amin'ny fitsipika sy ny soatoavintsika ihany no ampiasao”.
43I want to talk about the Shining Path in Peru. There is no debate about why we call them terrorists.Efa nanangana fifanakalozan-kevitra hidify [fa tsy hifidy] ny fampiasana ireo voambolana horohoro, fampihorohoroana, mpampihorohoro ny ekipam-panoratana ato aminay raha tsy ny tsonga na ny loharanom-baovao nakana azy mihitsy no mampiasa azy, satria :
44And added [42:50- 43:30]: Just yesterday this happened.Nifanaraka izahay fa “matanjaka kokoa noho ny mpamari-toetra ny famariparitana ireo (fi)hetsika nisy”.
45There is a website in Peru run by expats, they published an article about the expulsion of a former terrorist Lori Berenson, a US citizen after serving her [terrorism] sentence.
46She was called an activist [in the headline] and this caused a lot of indignation amongst its readers.
47After that the website corrected the language and issued an apology.
48I asked Elizabeth if she thought the use of the word was controversial.
49She said (17:38- 18:30)
50I think the term is controversial for sure.
51Controversial in the present.
52And controversial to describe things what happened in the past. Again, it is all about politics, right?Ary tokony ho mailo izahay amin'ny mety ho kirakiran'ny governemanta na vondron'olona mitady hifehy ny fomba fitantarana sy ny fomba fijery amin'ny alalan'ny petak'anarana.
53For example, in Chile, right now there is a controversy to use that term for the Mapuches, an indigenous community in the south of Chile, who are claiming rights of their land and autonomy.
54Sometimes the more extreme of the Mapuche go into the landowner houses and burn them. And many people call them terrorists.Tamin'ny fanarahana ity fifanakalozan-kevitra ity, ny iray amin'ny mpandray anjara hatry ny ela indrindra avy any Però, Juan Arellano, no naneho ny ahiahiny fa manevateva ny fahatsiarovana ireo lasibatra matin'ny fampihorohoroana ny fanapahan-kevitra tsy hampiasa ny petak'anarana.
55But there is a huge controversy about that.
56Are they defending their right? Or are they being terrorists?Nalainy ho ohatra amin'izany ny Sakelika Manjalanjelatra [fr: Sentier Lumineux] tao Però.
57It depends on who you talk too.
58Taisa added (37:40 - 38:40)
59We should definitely be very careful using the word.
60Kevin raised an interesting point about how the word is emotionally-satisfying.
61It is politically charged, but it became a thing itself.
62People use it to express their rage.
63And we have to be careful, even as journalists, even as Global Voices, not to sound too detached, not to sound too hygienic, too careful.
64At the same time, we have to take into consideration the context, attribution I think is a good way.
65After Lauren suggested that we apply the same diligence that we use with the term “treason” when using “terrorism,” Kevin agreed, adding (39:50 - 42:00):
66It would weird to use a modifier on an individual or even organization to call them a “thief.”
67It would just be odd.
68You wouldn't introduce a character like that in a story. It's a strange pronoun or adjective.Amin'ity andian'ny GV Face ity izahay nanokatra ny fifanakalozan-kevitra amin'ny petak'anarana, ny politikan'ny fiteny indrindra fa manodidina ny “fampihorohoroana” ato amin'ny fikambanana Global Voices.
69It's probably best to stick with attribution, whatever some sort of formal body has identified them as, or if you are quoting people, they are going to be using terrorism left and right.
70Use some sort of qualifier.
71There is a trade-off there and the language could become sterilized and authors need to be mindful.
72They need to look at a text and when it is done, if it looks like a white paper or like a memo on an event and you are trying to connect with people.
73I am not saying, ‘throw in terrorist everywhere'.
74But that it might mean that you have distanced yourself too much from the piece. You are informing people but that it isn't prohibition on being emotionally engaging.Juan Arellano moa dia nohatevenin'i Toniam-baovaon'ny GV Lauren Finch, Taisa Sganzerla, tonian'i Brezila, blaogera Libaney sady mpandray anjara avy ao Afovoany Atsinanana Joey Ayoub, tonian'ny RunetEcho Kevin Rothrock ary i Elizabeth Rivera, tonian'ny fampitam-baovao sosialy sady mpandray anjara avy any Amerika Latina.
75Or using descriptions of violence?
76(I interrupted)
77Sure.
78We are breaking it out to be that it is bold to use the term terrorism, but in reality it would be a lot more work to spell it out.